|
* indicates
required information |
Contact
Information |
| |
| |
Reviewer
Qualifications |
For the FY08 grant period, interested reviewers should note that OUP has two separate reviews: an onsite review that occurs in Washington, D.C., for our AN/NHIAC, HBCU, HSIAC, and TCUP grants; and an online review for our DDRG/EDSRG grants. Visit OUP Programs http://www.oup.org/programs/programs.asp section for additional information on each grant program. Please note that you must have a Ph.D. in a housing- or community development-related field to qualify as a reviewer for our online DDRG/EDSRG review.
|
Degrees
*
(list most recent degrees first; include degree type and
concentration, university, city, and state; for example, "Ph.D.,
Urban Planning, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland")
|
|
Which review would you prefer? *
(Remember you will not qualify for the DDRG/ESDRG review if you do not have a Ph.D.) |
Onsite Review
Online DDRG/EDSRG Review
Both |
|
| Conflicts
of Interest:
To ensure that you are not assigned applications from any schools with
which you have previous or current affiliations, please answer the following
questions as thoroughly as possible. |
Schools
you have attended: * |
|
| Schools for which you have
worked or provided consultant services: * |
|
| Any other schools that
you or your immediate family have attended or worked for: * |
|
If you are currently a university
employee, please confirm whether your school is applying for a 2008 OUP
grant: *
|
|
| Grant
Information: * |
Are you a current or recent OUP grantee
(please select all applicable programs)?
|
Please select the OUP programs for which
you have previously reviewed, including the year in which you most recently
reviewed:
|
Do you have prior or current experience
working in any of these areas?
|
|
Qualifications:
*
Reviewers must be
able to:
- Analyze the contents
of up to six proposals and prepare comments (typed on a laptop) based
on information/data presented in the proposal.
- Work as part of
a team.
- Commit to the length
of the review (7 days, including travel time).
- Work long hours
under tight deadlines (including Saturday).
|
You
must meet at least THREE of the following criteria to qualify as
a potential reviewer. Please select all criteria that are applicable:
|
| |
| Computer
Requirements |
Laptops: *
This year's peer review process requires that reviewers enter their data
electronically. Only those reviewers who can provide written explanation
as to why they cannot meet this requirement will be eligible to borrow
a laptop onsite. |
| Please select your laptop type: |
IBM
Macintosh
Cannot bring laptop (must
explain):
|
|
If you are borrowing a laptop,
please confirm the answers to the questions on Storage Devices
and Software. If you indicated in the preceding section that you cannot
bring a laptop, please check "No" for the Storage Devices questions
and "Other" for the Software question.
|
Storage Devices:
*
OUP staff prefer if reviewers have laptops that can accommodate Universal
Serial Bus (USB)
(also referred to as jump drives, memory sticks, pen drives, or thumb drives).
|
| Does your laptop have
(these are located either on the sides or the back of the laptop)? |
Yes
No
|
| Do you have a USB flash memory? |
Yes
No |
| |
|
|
Software:
*
OUP staff prefers that reviewers have a version
of Microsoft Word that is no older than Word 2000. OUP also requires that reviewers have a version of Microsoft Excel that is no older than Excel 2000. |
| Please confirm which version of Microsoft
Word your laptop has: |
Word 2000
Word XP
Word 2003
Word 2007
Other (Please explain):
|
| Please confirm which version of Microsoft
Excel your laptop has: |
Excel 2000
Excel 2002
Excel 2003
Excel 2007
Other (Please explain):
|
|
Typing Skills:
*
This year, OUP staff will not accept handwritten reviews. Reviewers,
therefore, must be able to type all their comments. Your typing skills
must be such that you will not delay the progress of your review group
and you will be able to complete all your comments by the end of the peer
review week. |
| I understand the typing requirements
of this year's peer review. My typing skills are such that I will be able
to submit my comments on all the applications assigned to me within the
allotted review time. |
| |